Trump Promises To ‘Look At’ Social Security And Medicare Cuts (Impeachment and removal a MUST!)

Donald Trump ran on an absolute promise not to cut entitlement and social safety net programs. On Wednesday, he said he hopes to do just that — and soon. Asked by CNBC if entitlement cuts were something he would consider, Trump said he would “toward the end of the year.”

In 2011, Trump tweeted that a “robust growing economy is how to fix Social Security and Medicare—not cuts on Seniors.”

Throughout his 2016 campaign, he used it to differentiate himself from the rest of his party and even Democrats.

“Every Republican wants to do a big number of Social Security. They want to do it on Medicare, they want to do it on Medicaid,” Trump said in an April 2015 speech, not long before launching his White House bid. “And we can’t do that. And it’s not fair to the people that have been paying in for years.”

Well, “Mandatory programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security actually make up about half of the federal government’s spending each year.” Says the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

So, “mandatory programs are outside the annual budget process that governs discretionary spending”. “The government expects to spend $4.746 trillion in 2020. Almost 60% of that pays for mandated benefits such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid—the mandatory spending category.” The budget estimated that mandatory spending would be $2.841 trillion in FY 2020. This category includes entitlement programs such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, unemployment compensation, and others. [Entitlement program?: Social Security costs are currently 100% covered by payroll taxes and interest on investments.] Until 2010, there was more coming into the Social Security Trust Fund than being paid out.

If national debt continues to climb in relation to GDP, then it could become difficult, many decades down the road, for the federal government to meet its interest and maturity obligations on bonds.

Point of interest: “The taxation of Social Security began in 1984 following passage of a set of Amendments in 1983, which were signed into law by President Reagan in April 1983.”

So, ‘mandatory spending vs discretionary spending”?

“The discretionary budget for 2020 is $1.426 trillion. More than half goes toward military spending, including the Department of Veterans Affairs and other defense-related departments. The rest must pay for all other domestic programs. The largest of these programs are Health and Human Services, Education, and Housing and Urban Development.

There is an emergency fund of $200.1 billion held in reserve. Most of this fund goes to Overseas Contingency Operations to pay for wars or continuing military actions.

A growing portion of the discretionary budget is set aside for disaster relief such as hurricane and wildfire relief.”

So, it would seem to me, what we are talking about is Trump cutting benefits to a Mandatory Spending program which is already paid for with our income, Social Security and Medicare premiums (call them taxes if you like). Think Trump needs to go.

What happened in Hungary appears to be replicating in the United States of Trump

Source of info Please go there and read the entire article. It’s immense!

This is the headline:

It happened there: how democracy died in Hungary

A new kind of authoritarianism is taking root in Europe — and there are warning signs for America.

(My bold showing similarities)

” Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who had sold it [a 500 mile fence] to the public as Hungary’s first line of defense against an “invasion” of asylum seekers during a massive surge in migration to Europe from conflict-ridden countries in 2015. Two years later, he sent a bill for the fence’s construction cost to Brussels, suggesting the European Union should repay Hungary for ”protecting all the citizens of Europe from the flood of illegal migrants.” “

” But the true face of modern Hungary isn’t gleaming Budapest. It’s the immense security apparatus at the border — the barbed-wire fence, the refugee boys sleeping in the dirt, the border guard making trouble for journalists — that reveals the very modern kind of authoritarian state Hungary has become. “

” Prime Minister Orbán has chipped away at the foundations of Hungarian democracy. It has been replaced with an authoritarian regime that wields a cynical interpretation of the law as a weapon; the country is governed by rules like the border journalism permits, regulations that can seem reasonable on their face but actually serve to undermine essential democratic freedoms.

FOX NEWS???

“government controls the airwaves and media companies to such a degree that the opposition can’t get a fair hearing “

And who is in charge of our country? Billionaires like Devos? Munchin?

” economy seems to be growing, but a significant number of corporations are controlled by Orbán’s cronies. “

Sound like Trump?

“drumbeat of propaganda, from both official state outlets and the private media empires of Orbán allies, demonizes refugees and Muslims, warning of an existential threat to Hungarian society and culture — and touting the Orbán regime as the only thing protecting the country from an Islamic takeover “

soft fascism”

“Call it “soft fascism”: a political system that aims to stamp out dissent and seize control of every major aspect of a country’s political and social life, without needing to resort to “hard” measures like banning elections and building up a police state.”

“too little, too late: Orbán has consolidated his power, and the opposition is too weak and divided to pose a major threat in the foreseeable future.

Hungary is a warning of what could happen when a ruthless, anti-minority populist backed by a major political party is allowed to govern unchecked. Americans need to pay attention.

” The state’s economic policies are cleverly designed both to enrich Orbán’s allies and to neutralize potential threats to their hold on power.Fidesz watches Hungary’s business community closely because they’re the people who could finance an anti-government uprising, and punishes those it sees as potentially serious threats. Nobody, from ordinary businesspeople all the way up to the top oligarchs like Simicska, can survive without Orbán’s favor.

So, do you think we have a major problem here with the Trump/Republican factor? What do you think they can do with another 4 years of power?

Only solution I think we have is at the ballot box and our base will vote, I know that. But what of the other 100 million that don’t? Aren’t they willing to live under a autocratic regime for the next 100 years????

I hope not.

Star Wars: Episode IX – The Rise of Skywalker

So, a friend went to see this movie and insisted I go and report back 🙂 I tried to enlist a couple of others to go with me but (actually 4 others!) no one would go with me. So what do I think?

https://www.metacritic.com/movie/star-wars-episode-ix—the-rise-of-skywalker

First, overall, gave it a 6 out of ten. A lot of the dialog I couldn’t hear or understand so that hurt. Visually? Some of the scenes were incredible! Some seemed like were throw backs to some of the other Star Wars movies.

The movie bombarded me with sight, sound and chaos! I did tear up a couple times close to the end. I did doze some at the beginning. I am glad I didn’t opt for the 3D version…it would have been overwhelming I do believe!

I’d like to see it again to look and understand some of what I missed in this first viewing though.

Looking at the other reviews, I think they agree with me.